Let’s
analyze a sentence from a story:
The story: Two women discuss a
visit to a doctor. The one who saw the specialist is fine and found
to be in good health. She tells the other....
“The cardiologist said my heart
was strong enough to last another fifty years.”
The parts of the sentence that
don’t jibe are the words said
and was.
The word said
implies something already spoken and is being related in the
conversation. This word is correctly used.
The word was
is past-tense and ambiguous. Used as it is in this sentence, it
implies something has changed to the woman’s health since she
visited her doctor; was healthy then, but now....
As stated at the top of this
article, we know that the woman’s health is still fine, so the bit
of dialogue must accurately show that as well.
Though the dialogue talks about
something that happened in the past—the conversation with the
doctor—the health condition has not changed in the present. The
correct way to write that bit of dialogue is:
“The cardiologist said my heart
is strong enough to last another fifty years.”
The word was
is replaced with is,
implying the woman’s heart remains healthy.
Simple nuances like these go
undetected by most, even by many avid readers. Misuse of certain
words and phrases are part of the colloquial way our English has
evolved over time.
To be grammatically correct with
past, present and future tenses in writing, we need to be astute and
analyze our sentence structures and make them cohesive.
Mary Deal
Author, Painter, Photographer
Eric Hoffer Book Award Winner
National Indie Excellence Book Awards Finalist (past)
National Indie Excellence Book Awards Finalist (past)
Pushcart Prize Nominee
Global eBook Awards Nominee
Global eBook Awards Nominee
2014 National Indie Excellence Book Awards Finalist
Global eBook Awards Bronze
Global eBook Awards Silver
Blog: http://www.marydeal.com
Art Gallery: http://www.MaryDealFineArt.comGift Gallery: zazzle.com/IslandImageGallery*
Gift Gallery: http://www.redbubble.com/people/localme
Comments
Post a Comment